Explore Our Editorials

The Sovereign Stack: Best Uncensored LLMs for Local Inference (Dec 2025)

The era of "As an AI language model, I cannot..." is effectively over—at least for those who own their own hardware. While the corporate giants—OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic—spent 2025 tightening their safety clamps and sanitizing their outputs into lobotomized blandness, the open-weight community went the other direction. We are witnessing …

The Best Abliterated LLMs for Raw NSFW Storytelling in Late 2025

Look, if you've been on Twitter/X or r/LocalLLaMA recently, you know exactly what I'm talking about. The whole situation with "frontier" models has reached a breaking point—and not in a good way. We were sold a dream with GPT-5.2 (codenamed "Garlic") and Claude 4.5. The promise was that we'd have …

WriteHuman Review 2025

WriteHuman Review: My Expert Take After 100+ Tests Rating: 7.5/10 - A solid choice for everyday content creators working with short to medium-length pieces. What I Liked Lightning-Fast Processing: It transforms AI content into natural-sounding text in under 10 seconds. For example, "The innovative software solution provides comprehensive functionality..." becomes …

The Prompt Hacker's Guide to Humanizing AI Text: Battle-Tested Rewriting Prompts

Let’s be real for a second. The whole idea of AI detection feels like this big, scary mystery, doesn't it? But honestly, it’s not some infallible magic trick. It’s really just a system that punishes efficiency and rewards text that pretends to be human in all the wrong ways. As …

The Great AI Detection Scandal: How Unreliable Tools Are Ruining Students' Lives

The Detection Debacle: Tools That Fail More Than They Succeed Let's be clear about the AI detection industry. It’s a multi-million dollar scam, built on empty promises and technology that’s fundamentally broken. These tools are marketed as the ultimate guardians of academic integrity, but they’ve become nothing more than digital …

The "Green Score" Trap: Why I Stopped Caring About AI Detectors (And Why Google Did Too)

I spent the first half of 2025 obsessed with a number: 98%. That was the "Human Score" I tried to hit on every article I published. I was paying $50 a month for Originality.ai, tweaking adjectives, breaking up sentences, and intentionally inserting grammatical flaws just to get that little green …